Published as poster at the ACS Colloid & Surface Science Symposium, June 14-19, 2009 @ Columbia University, New York, NY, by Dr. Hanno Wachernig, Particle Metrix GmbH, www.particle-metrix.de
Nearly any surface carries ionic charge. If it is sufficiently high, particles repel each other keeping a dispersion stable. Immersed in water, the charge is immediately compensated by surrounding ions, forming an electrostatic double layer. Although it is neutral from outside, the double layer can be peeled off quite easily by physical arrangements such as electrophoresis, ultrasonic vibration, mechanical shearing and others. By applying these techniques, the ionic charge of the interface is measurable as a particle interface potential PIP, indicating dispersion stability or instability. In this contribution, the “streaming potential” sensing is presented as an effective tool to map the electrostatic behavior of polyelectrolytes and particles. As signal measurement and mixing of titrand solution to the sample is achieved within 5 seconds, one complete titration can be performed within 5 minutes. The method can be applied to polyelectrolyte solutions (size > 0.5 nm) and to dispersions up to 300 µm particle size. To be correct, when going from small to big particles the method changes gradually from streaming to an “inertia potential” sensing.
0.1 g is needed as a minimum sample quantity. Concentrations up to 40% are possible, bearing in mind that high viscosity is a limitation. The result correlates to zeta potential in many cases, yet has to be proven for a given sample class.
A fast oscillating flow of the fluid in the gap between the piston and the measurement cylinder is produced by the moving piston. This causes a periodic shearing at the double layer at the particle's / macromolecule's interface leading to an ionic polarization inside the gap. This polarization voltage is proportional to the zeta potential ZP, which is one of the better known candidates of PIP. Macromolecules tend to stick to the wall contributing to a voltage signal proportional to the zeta potential, the velocity of the fluid and some physical constants of the liquid. Big particles deliver an inertia polarization signal. In an inhomogeneous system there is a mixture of both.
Repeatability and modern software of the StabiSizer® instrument make optimum use of this particle charge mapping method. Three selected examples discussed here, open a window to look at a wide field of applications.
Optimization of the recycling efficiency for water of a pigment suspension: Or: The optimum combination of FeCl3 precipitation and cationic polymer flocculation.
The efficiency of FeCl3 to bring the PIP near to zero comes to a saturation at a given concentration. The StabiSizer® PIP titration against added volume of FeCl3 solution at two different concentrations indicating this.
The cationic polymer consumption at various FeCl3 concentration levels is shown in the first figure. The biggest variation of the cationic polymer con-sumption is seen between “10%” and “40%” of 7 mL/L (figure 2). As a result, it does not make sense to operate the recycling above 30% FeCl3 concentration. A similar behavior could be observed using a Turbiscan instrument to follow sedimentation. This is described in the Particle Metrix application note C08.
Total charge of 4 cationic Chitosan polymer solutions and correlation to zeta potential
The anionic polymer consumption of 1% Chitosan measured with the StabiSizer® is compared with the electrophoresis zeta potential determined with the ZetaView® (figure 3 and 4). The size of the Chitosan macromolecules is 0.96 nm and was found with the Nanotrac® DLS analyzer.
Although the lower size limit of ZetaView® is at 80 nm size, the measurement on a few Chitosan agglomerates could deliver very reasonable zeta potential results. The correlation of the StabiSizer® polyelectrolyte consumption (titration curves below) to zeta potential is interesting for those used to “think” in zeta potential. No other method could deliver an indication of zeta potential.
To measure ionic charge of macromolecules and nanoparticles < 5 nm size in general is a unique feature of the method. An example of PIP versus pH titration on proteins is given in the application note C08.
The untreated sample (blue) consumes much less calibrated cationic Poly-DADMAC than the modified one (red). The density of COOH charge at the treated CNT interface was 270 meq/g sample.
The PIP titration is a versatile tool to map the ionic behaviour of macromolecular solutions and particle dispersions in various ways.
Dr. Hanno Wachernig, email@example.com
Particle Metrix Application Note C08, issued at the ACS Colloid & Surface Science Symposium, June 14-19, 2009 @ Columbia University, New York, NY.